]
Executive Summary
|
This is an evaluation of the Centre for Cross Border Studies,
Armagh carried out in March 2002. The evaluation is based
on the examination of the records of the Centre, 35 personal
or phone interviews and survey work. There were seven reference
groups for the evaluation: staff, board members, policy-makers,
commissioners of the Centre's research, researchers, unsuccessful
research applicants and the Centre's target groups. 278 persons
were surveyed (final overall response rate: 151 people or
54%).
The Centre was established in 1999 as a project of the
Queen's University Belfast, Dublin City University and the
Workers Educational Association, aiming to research and develop
co-operation across the Irish border in a range of practical
areas. In the period from September 1999 to March 2002, the
Centre ran three research rounds with eight projects, held
16 study days, ran an in-house research project, completed
four mapping studies, carried out six commissioned research
projects, published three books and reached out to a range
of audiences through press conferences and launches. Spending
rose from UK£170,000 in the first financial year to UK£327,000
in the second. The Centre has three staff and a board of
eleven. The evaluation examined the Centre's performance. The
Centre has generated extensive media attention. Interest
in the website rose from 165 weekly visits to over 900. The
reference groups rated the Centre highly for the quantity
and relevance of its work. The Centre is considered to be
dynamic, entrepreneurial, value for money, effective, independent,
credible, non-partisan, producing reports which are substantial
and strike the right tone. Ratings for its quality of work
range from 6.34 to 8.05 [out of 10]. The director is praised
for his energy and commitment. Researchers have a positive
experience of working for the Centre. Commissioning agencies
are satisfied with the work done for them. Unsuccessful applicants
are positive about their interaction with the Centre, the
secretariat getting a 100% rating for helpfulness. Its conferences
are well received. The Centre has an effective, functioning
working board providing oversight, planning and accountability.
Critical comments on the performance of the Centre concern
its excessive caution, tameness, insufficient outreach, the
danger of capture by the North South Ministerial Council,
under-developed links to non-governmental and academic bodies,
and its promotion and visibility. The evaluation examined the Centre's impact. There is
a good rate of recognition of the research reports, but overall
policy impact is modest so far. Some research reports may
have brought about concrete changes. There are several key issues which the Centre must address:
financial security; improved targeting and outreach; physical
development; modification of the composition of the board;
and the development of a European dimension. Specific proposals
are put forward whereby the Centre may obtain medium to long-term
funding streams (universities, government, consultancy, sales,
membership, corporate funding); build its mailing list; prioritize
its target groups; reach out to non-governmental organizations
and politicians; construct links to Europe; develop a library
and promote itself more effectively (newsletters, annual
reports, popular summaries). Future research strategies should
be based around flagship projects, cross-cutting themes and
smaller sectoral projects (topics are proposed). A yearbook
should extract the accumulated lessons learned. As it moves
from its experimental phase to maturity, the Centre has a
bright future. |
See an extract from the final report.